Lastest in Celeb News

Category archive

Legal

Leah Messer, Star of Teen Mom, Files a Restraining Order Against Ex-Husband Jeremy Calvert After Ugly Confrontation

in Celebrities/Legal by

In the world of reality TV, the personal lives of celebrities often become fodder for public scrutiny. Recently, “Teen Mom 2” star Leah Messer made headlines by filing a restraining order against her ex-husband, Jeremy Calvert. This legal step marks a significant shift in their relationship and raises questions about the reasons behind this decision. “The Ashleys Reality Roundup” was the first to report the details of the protective order.

Leah Messer and Jeremy Calvert, who share a child together, have had a tumultuous relationship in the public eye. They initially married in 2012, but the union faced challenges and eventually ended in divorce in 2015. Despite their separation, they have continued to co-parent their daughter. However, recent developments have led Messer to take legal action.

While specific details about the restraining order filed by Leah Messer have not been publicly disclosed, it is believed that there are serious concerns prompting this legal action based on rumors from an account on Instagram. The decision for her to file a restraining order is believed to be based on the rumor that Messer feels threatened or harassed by Calvert and believes it necessary to establish boundaries for her own safety and well-being. It was revealed on the Instagram account, “Teenmomfanz” that Calvert came to Messer’s place of work to confront Messer.

According to an insider, Calvert showed up at Messer’s work because, “Jeremy is a very jealous, manipulative person. He says he has his reasons for what he did, but none are sufficient enough to be a good excuse.”

The confrontation because very ugly and Messer felt like it was necessary for her safety. Details of the alleged confrontation were scarce until “The Ashleys Reality Roundup” posted an article with more details. According to their sources, Jeremey, “stormed in and was intimidating Leah. He had a group of guys with him, as well as his girlfriend, backing him up,” the source said. “The big group made a huge commotion inside the restaurant.”

The source said despite the confrontation being hostile and involving multiple people, no one was physically injured. Also, it was reported that the police did not come to the restaurant and no one was arrested at the time.

Filing a restraining order is a significant step in seeking protection from someone who is causing fear or harm. The process typically involves gathering evidence and presenting it to a judge to demonstrate the need for such an order. If the restraining order is granted, it can prohibit the restrained individual from making direct contact with the petitioner or coming within a certain distance.

The implications of filing a restraining order are far-reaching. It can change the dynamics of co-parenting and affect the relationship between the parties involved. In cases where children are involved, visitation rights and custody arrangements may be reviewed by the court, taking into consideration the protective measures implemented through the restraining order. Additionally, a restraining order can provide the petitioner with a sense of security and peace of mind.

Leah Messer hopefully will seek support from her loved ones, including friends and family, as well as professional therapists or counselors who can provide guidance throughout this process. It is crucial for individuals facing similar situations to understand the available support systems and resources that exist to help them through challenging times.

Leah Messer’s decision to file a restraining order against her ex-husband Jeremy Calvert sheds light on the complexities of personal relationships in the public eye. While the specific details surrounding this case remain undisclosed, the act of taking legal action signifies a concern for personal safety and a desire to establish clear boundaries.

As the legal process unfolds, we will report on the details.

You might be interested in

Keke Palmer Granted Restraining Order Against Her EX, Darius Jackson

in Celebrities/Legal by

Keke Palmer recently filed a restraining order against her ex-boyfriend, Darius Jackson. After years of emotional and physical abuse, the actress and singer finally decided to take a stand and protect herself.

According to court documents, Palmer claims that Jackson has been harassing and stalking her since they broke up in January 2020. She also alleges that he has threatened her life and the lives of her family members. Palmer says that Jackson has sent her threatening texts, called her repeatedly, and shown up at her house unannounced.

In her request for a restraining order, Palmer states that she is in fear for her safety and the safety of those around her. She also alleges that Jackson has been using her social media accounts to spread false rumors and slander her name.

The restraining order requires Jackson to stay at least 100 yards away from Palmer and her family. It also prevents him from contacting her, directly or indirectly, and forbids him from posting anything about her on social media.

This is not the first time that Palmer has had to deal with abusive relationships. In 2018, she filed a restraining order against her former assistant, Ryan Burton, who she accused of physical and verbal abuse.

Palmer’s story is yet another example of why it’s so important to take a stand against domestic violence. Palmer is an advocate for survivors of abuse and has been vocal about her own experiences. She urges anyone who is in an abusive relationship to reach out for help and to take the necessary steps to protect themselves.

We hope that this restraining order will give Palmer the peace of mind she deserves and help her move on from this traumatic experience. No one should have to live in fear or suffer in silence.

Keke Palmer has recently filed a restraining order against her former friend Darius Jackson. This follows a tumultuous and short-lived friendship between the two.

Palmer and Jackson met in late 2020 and quickly developed a close friendship. However, by early 2021, things had taken a sour turn and the two had a falling out. Since then, Palmer has been vocal about her concerns for her safety and has accused Jackson of cyberbullying, harassment, and stalking.

Now, Palmer has taken legal action and filed a restraining order against Jackson in an effort to protect herself and her family. According to reports, the order requires Jackson to stay at least 100 yards away from Palmer and her family at all times.

The court documents filed by Palmer include a detailed list of the alleged harassment, cyberbullying, and stalking that she claims to have been subjected to by Jackson. She claims that he has sent her threatening messages, made numerous attempts to contact her, and has even tracked her movements.

The documents also state that Jackson has posted numerous images of Palmer on social media and has made derogatory comments about her. Palmer has also claimed that Jackson has made attempts to contact her family and friends in an attempt to gain access to her.

The court is expected to hear Palmer’s case and decide whether or not to grant the restraining order. If the order is granted, it will serve to protect Palmer and her family from any further harassment and cyberbullying by Jackson.

Palmer has been vocal about her experience with Jackson and has been advocating for others who have been subjected to bullying and harassment. She is encouraging victims of cyberbullying and harassment to speak up and take action, even if it means filing a restraining order.

This is an important reminder that no one should have to suffer in silence. It is vital that victims of cyberbullying and harassment have the resources and the support to take action. With the increasing prevalence of cyberbullying, it is essential that victims know that they can and should take steps to protect themselves. Keke Palmer’s case is a reminder that no one should have to suffer in silence, and that there are steps that can be taken to protect oneself from further harassment and cyberbullying.

Keke Palmer recently took legal action against her former personal assistant, Darius Jackson, filing a restraining order in Los Angeles County Court on Tuesday, January 5, 2021. This restraining order follows numerous allegations against Jackson, including sexual harassment, cyberstalking, and ongoing threats and verbal abuse. 

Palmer, a multi-talented actress, singer, and TV host, first hired Jackson in 2017. She claims that in September 2020, Jackson began to display harassing and threatening behavior. According to court documents, Jackson threatened to release private videos and photos of Palmer to the public. He also allegedly sent her hundreds of unwanted text messages and emails. 

The situation escalated on January 1, 2021, when Jackson allegedly showed up unannounced at Palmer’s home. When Palmer asked him to leave, he refused and then harassed her via text messages and calls. In addition to the restraining order, Palmer has also filed a civil harassment restraining order against Jackson. 

The restraining order requires Jackson to stay at least 100 yards away from Palmer, her home, her workplace, and any other places she may frequent. He is also prohibited from contacting her in any way including through social media, email, or text. The court order also requires him to delete all photos and videos of Palmer on any device he owns. 

The restraining order is set to last until a hearing on February 12, 2021. At the hearing, a judge will determine whether the order should be extended. If granted, Jackson will be legally required to stay away from Palmer until the order expires. She was also granted sole custody of her eight month old son. According to CNN, “Palmer requested full physical and legal custody of Leodis from the court, citing allegations of physical abuse including ‘many instances of physical violence, including striking and grabbing me around the neck.’”

Palmer’s restraining order is a reminder to survivors of harassment and abuse that you have the right to take legal action. It is important to remember that this type of behavior is unacceptable. If you are experiencing any type of harassment or abuse, it is important to reach out to the proper authorities and take legal action if necessary.

You might be interested in

Ivanka Trump’s Testimony: A Legal Battle Unfolds

in Legal by

Ivanka Trump, the eldest daughter of former President Donald Trump and a prominent figure in the Trump Organization, finds herself at the center of a high-stakes legal battle. A $250 million fraud trial against her family and their business empire has taken a dramatic turn as she faces the prospect of testifying in court. In this article, we delve into the details of Ivanka Trump’s legal challenge, the arguments made by her attorney, and the court’s decision to deny her request to avoid testifying. Let’s explore the unfolding events and the implications they hold.

The Request to Avoid Testifying

In her bid to avoid testifying in the fraud trial, Ivanka Trump argued that she would suffer “undue hardship” if forced to appear in court, particularly because it coincided with a school week. Her attorney filed an appeal seeking a stay of the order for her testimony until her appeal could be heard. The appeal also requested a pause in the entire trial until Ivanka’s appeal could be considered. However, the motion for a stay was swiftly denied by the court, setting the stage for her testimony.

The Court’s Ruling: Ivanka Trump Must Testify

A New York appeals court denied Ivanka Trump’s request to avoid testifying in the fraud trial. The court’s decision means that she must appear in Manhattan Supreme Court as previously ordered. This ruling comes after Ivanka’s two adult brothers, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, testified earlier in the trial. The focus now shifts to Ivanka Trump as she prepares to take the stand next Wednesday, following her father, former President Donald Trump, who is scheduled to testify on Monday.

The Allegations and Background of the Fraud Trial

The fraud trial, brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, alleges a decade-long scheme to falsely inflate Donald Trump Sr.’s net worth. The aim was to obtain various financial perks, including tax benefits and better loan terms. Ivanka Trump, along with her two adult brothers, Donald Jr. and Eric, are named as co-defendants in James’ case.

Ivanka Trump was initially listed as a co-defendant, but she was removed earlier this year on grounds of the statute of limitations. The claims against her were found to fall outside the permissible timeframe. Despite her dismissal as a co-defendant, Ivanka Trump still possesses firsthand knowledge of the issues central to the ongoing trial.

Arguments Presented by Ivanka Trump’s Attorney

Ivanka Trump’s attorney, Bennett Moskowitz, presented several arguments in an attempt to prevent her from testifying. He argued that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over Ivanka Trump since she is not a resident of New York but of Florida. Moskowitz also claimed that the subpoenas for her testimony were improperly served and that the judge made multiple errors in his prior ruling.

Furthermore, Moskowitz emphasized that Ivanka Trump’s appearance in court during a school week would cause “undue hardship.” He highlighted her responsibility as a parent to three minor children and the disruption it would cause to their education. However, the court rejected these arguments, asserting that her attendance for a single day of testimony does not warrant emergency relief.

New York Attorney General’s Response

New York Attorney General Letitia James opposed Ivanka Trump’s request to avoid testifying, deeming the arguments put forth by her attorney as “utterly meritless.” James emphasized that Ivanka Trump’s firsthand knowledge of the issues at hand is crucial to the fair and orderly resolution of the trial. She countered the claim that the court lacked jurisdiction over Ivanka Trump, citing her ownership of property in New York and continued business transactions within the state.

James also refuted the notion that Ivanka Trump’s need to attend the trial for a single day would constitute undue hardship. She highlighted the resources available to the Kushner family, Ivanka’s husband Jared Kushner being a billionaire, and their ability to afford additional childcare if required.

The Implications and Conclusion

With the court’s ruling denying her request, Ivanka Trump is set to testify in the $250 million fraud trial. Her testimony is expected to provide crucial insights into the alleged scheme to inflate her father’s net worth. As the trial proceeds, the significance of her appearance in court cannot be understated. The outcome of this legal battle will have far-reaching consequences for the Trump family and their business empire.

In conclusion, the denial of Ivanka Trump’s request to avoid testifying in the fraud trial marks a significant development in this high-profile case. The court’s decision highlights the importance of her firsthand knowledge and its relevance to the trial. As the legal battle unfolds, all eyes will be on Ivanka Trump as she takes the stand and provides her testimony. Stay tuned for further updates on this captivating legal saga.

You might be interested in

Go to Top